SEATTLE — Calls are mounting for King County to revamp plans to build a controversial new juvenile detention facility in Seattle, commonly referred to as a youth jail, with a number of county and city officials joining the chorus.
“No matter how good a jail system you build for kids, when you put a kid in jail the outcomes are universally bad,” said King County Councilmember Rod Dembowski.
Dembowski has written an op-ed with Seattle City Councilmember Bruce Harrell that calls for a halt to planning for the previously approved new Children and Family Justice Center in Seattle’s Central District, and a significant change in the design that de-emphasizes incarceration.
Related: ‘Block the Bunker’ blocks Seattle City Council meeting
Although King County voters overwhelmingly approved a levy in 2012 to pay for the new youth jail, Dembowski says mismanagement has led to cost overruns and an outdated approach to youth justice.
“We told the voters that it would cost between $200 and $210 million when they approved it. Before we’ve even started construction, the current estimates are $225 million. To me that meant that we should hit the pause button and take a look and see if we could do better,” Dembowski said.
Dembowski says original plans called for the new youth jail facility to house a variety of services to support troubled youth and their families along with courtrooms and detention facilities.
But he says juvenile detention levels have dropped significantly in recent years — by 55 percent under King County Executive Dow Constantine — and the new facility fails to recognize changes to juvenile rehabilitation approaches.
And the City of Seattle declined a permit for a larger building, which would force the county to split the services that were supposed to be housed all under one roof between the new facility and the King County Courthouse.
“We’re talking about a shrunk down courthouse that won’t deliver on the promises and the needs of children and families in crisis. And I think that’s where we need to make a better investment and have a better project with a redesigned program,” Dembowski said.
Controversial youth jail
The project has been a focal point of vocal protesters who have repeatedly taken to the streets and shouted down council meetings in opposition.
They surrounded Mayor Ed Murray’s house recently, even though he has no say on the project.
Murray has sent a letter to King County Executive Dow Constantine and the county's top judge, joining the call to revamp the project, The Seattle Times reported.
Constantine is more than willing to take a new look at the facility even though he’s been a driving force in the project.
“I want the county to embrace this opportunity, building on our success to set a shared goal of zero detention of youth,” Constantine said.
But he says that’s not something that can happen overnight, and calls by critics to scrap the project altogether are unrealistic.
“So we also need to make sure when youth are detained, we are detaining them in a way that is beneficial to them, that is therapeutic, that gives them help with whatever problem brought them in,” Constantine said.
And he argues the current facility is woefully inadequate to handle that, especially when it comes to dealing with the most violent youth offenders.
Dembowski suggests one big focus can be reducing the number of jail cells and beds. Although Constantine and other supporters of the new facility back an entirely new jail, the councilmember says the old juvenile facility is more than adequate to handle detention needs — and save taxpayers millions at the same time.
“The detention facility up there — and this sometimes gets overlooked — was built in 1992. It is a functioning, serviceable, usable facility that can meet our needs. It does today,” Dembowski said. “It may need a little updating but I do believe there’s a path other than replacing the detention facility with brand new money and $112 new jail beds.”
Opponents have appealed the current permit, delaying any formal action for months. Ultimately, it’ll be up to the King County Council to decide what to do.